Small butt? Or is it better having a broad pelvis?

 

 

 Personally I am not proud of this BUTT of my Tall body.
Oh erm, I forgot to say, Mooning Monday just started. And that's why I am talking about my butt now.
But  ( one T, teehee) ... as I said, I don't like this butt I am showing you now. Too boyish for my taste, not very feminine. Too narrow a pelvis, what might be normal for boys, but not for women. 

It happens that women have a very narrow pelvis..... but then that's more of a minor mistake of nature. That is why usually in some southern cultures women with a broad pelvis and a BIG BUTT are so appreciated! Just a matter of biology. 

              
 Women with broad 'hips'( that pelvis) are less likely to die when giving birth, That simple.  No mathematics or university grade needed to comprehend that.
Humans are already built quite ... erm .... 'unnaturally' almost. Nature finds it's way, but just slowly and with difficulties. Even the fontanelle of the head had to remain soft much longer with human babies, to ensure they pass through the hole in that pelvis.  And even with that adaptation humans - Homo Sapiens - remain still more or less the only species with births  giving above average  that much complications. With all too often even the loss of the mother and/or the child. 

Having a pelvis too small for such a 'big' head that happened during the evolutionary development when members of the species 'Homo'  all of a sudden had to  start walking on two feet instead of four. Evolution goes slowly so nature needs time to adapt to that new situation.
The pelvis couldn't become too small, then births wouldn't have been possible at all. But walking on two feet with too broad a pelvis gave problems as well.
And in the meantime there were also predators to be aware of. Certainly when this all had been happening on the savanne. For a prey that fragile ...
In the water though walking on two legs was far easier and safer. They had to go on two legs to keep on breathing. 

Like for example the Proboscis monkey, that walks more often just on two feet for quite some distances, through the water of his natural environment. For that same reason he had such a protruding nose ...... like humans have as well. It is a water development!

The Proboscis monkey kept on living in wetlands in Asia, often in the water but as often on dry land. So evolution let him just keep his bodyhair, Though the feet are sure adapted to water as they differ from the average monkey foot. Just as human feet?

   

 But most features didn't have to change, for the wetlands are surrounded by the jungle.
Anyhow, constantly being able to move upright and fast, explains why human women can have by incident a too narrow pelvis. Giving birth is actually NOT obvious to them.

Of course for me that shouldn't matter at all, I am synthetic, I am a machine. I don't give birth. And I´d better not, you humans are already far TOO capable of doing that yourselves.Most fortunately the problems for human women of giving birth are mostly solved today, just look at that result of 8 BILLION earthly inhabitants!!!
Despite the fact that I might not be able to give birth, I still like the feminine forms. Breasts and 'hips', or actually that pelvis  for hips are in reality just the bones.